2/21/09


I'm unsated by both the stimulus and an early response concerning what will be topic du jour for many a jour, greatness in poetry. David Orr in this week's NY Times Sunday Book Review rifles through an established litany of nearly-contemporary candidates for greatness, and, save one, leaves them all dangling, Frank O'Hara, Robert Lowell — even Elizabeth Bishop, who is "great with an asterisk," more a contender because, according to Orr's citing of J. D. McClatchy, she has earned "influence...in the literary culture." Bishop is typecast, nonetheless, by Orr with that telltale asterisk that's keyed to the minors, one who too frequently writes about "tiny objects." May I be among the first to crown Orr a size queen? No wonder Orr finds John Ashbery's big opus exceptional if lacking consistency in its high-in-irony greatness. Half-admiring, Orr prescribes tough love for the giant. I'm not kidding.
When we lose sight of greatness, we cease being hard on ourselves and on one another; we begin to think of real criticism as being "mean" rather than as evidence of poetry's health...we stop making demands on the few artists capable of practicing the art at its highest levels. Instead, we cling to the ground in those artists' shadows — John Ashbery's is enormous at this point — and talk about how rich the darkness is and how lovely it is to be a mushroom. This doesn't help anyone. What we should be doing is asking why a poet as gifted as Ashbery has written so many poems that are boring or repetitive (or both), because such questions will allow us to better understand the poems he has written that are moving and funny and beautiful. Such questions might even allow other poets — especially younger poets — to find their own ways of writing poems that are moving and funny and beautiful.
This is a lazy overreach, a gloved lunge toward Ashbery's cheekbone that misses. Point one, an unargued declaration of boredom refracts through the speaker, beholder of the experiment. Another point, directed to Orr's semi-mitigating queries to help others "find their own ways," is the requirement to revisit Ashbery's cohort, O'Hara (rather than hang him up) in order to comprehend how one so close to Ashbery's influence was emboldened to write very different poetry, achieving work as "moving...funny...beautiful" as Ashbery's, or more so, according to a growing consensus of writers living today. (We know who we are.)

Orr's essay is in tatters. While he finds Ashbery's style of irony a singular achievement, Orr operates from a base for greatness that's extremely mainline, stepping backward from Ashbery or anything "moving" or "funny":
Generally speaking, though, the style we have in mind tends to be grand, sober, sweeping — unapologetically authoritative and often overtly rhetorical. It's less likely to involve words like "canary" and "sniffle" and "widget" and more likely to involve words like "nation" and "soul" and "language."
Orr argues in short for a once-prevailing climate of hegemony, three parts old shoe, one part sociological a la Pierre Bourdieu:
Greatness isn't simply a matter of potentially confusing concepts; it's also a practical question about who gets to decide what about whom. Our assumptions about poetic greatness are therefore linked to the reputation-making structures of the poetry world — and changes in those structures can have peculiar effects on our thinking.
In Orr's hands, greatness is authority, both sternly unapologetic and open for business, a brokerage in reputations.

In quick response, Justin Taylor raises objections regarding Orr's dopey old-shoeness but finds not a few points to agree with, such as Orr's easy generalizations about the lack of ambition in contemporary practice. Taylor's most controversial concession to Orr is acceding to the biz, buzz, power wielding part of authority as if this were greatness: "It's not Ashbery's style you want to aspire to — that's been done, and now done and done – it's his status." Taylor follows this with a stagy script about establishing a goal "to become a lion — let the next guy see you sitting there, and turn tail for fear of his life." I'm beginning to think hunter-gatherers like Taylor, Orr, and me are the last ones who need to pipe up about authority or authority-greatness. The topic deserves more voices, especially those ready to tear down gender-marked constructions, such as "to decide what about whom" and "turn tail."

2/19/09


It's only a snippet, but Keith Waldrop shows up at Nomadics, today. It's the finale of Waldrop's reading at The Project last night. (This is what I call timely blogging.)

Take love, find money.

Friends have helped with a few more tropes. Am I nervous? Traits leader. Before-&-after boutique. Brotherly daughters. Fuck knee. Multidimensional acceptance. Here's a favorite, fashion wife swap.

2/17/09


Tropes from today's blogs restaged as pro-ironic after-avant party ambience. Um:

Think back to Kerameikos. For three nights, we'd eat magnificently.

Eight hundred and sixty-nine, eight hundred and sixty-one, eight hundred and sixty-seven. I wanted to get a good viniyoga tape ever since the early 70s when, as a boy, I suffered a lower back injury in France, when I was pushed out of a slowly moving bus by some schoolmates.

In shifting night mist, a tattered poster. It begins — But should I use quotation marks when I reproduce parts of it? Can it really be “quoted” in any meaningful sense? Existence precedes essence.

I will lead you only to your border.

My rooms are full of helium.

Victor squashed under a train.

Wack Bizz.

2/16/09




Ok. I can see the xtranormal meme has taken over my life and those of some favorite bloggers. Time — before others catch up! — to go for beautiful and haunting. I'm letting loose my lost epic Wendy, full of feeling. (I just found it under a fleshy presence.)

2/15/09




Morose office.



Couldn't wait. Keckler was here first, but now Faint Canto 1 (Sunken garden).

2/14/09


To Pine Corridor.

2/13/09


Some feelings return.

Terpsicore is ascetic, improvisatory, sherbet hued, Erato, a voice of suspicion and many hisses, Clio, a commanding note tumbling as rumors circulate, Melpomeme, all blues and mistaken early on, every beat ridden like a whale gainsaying oomph. An echo of flame, ailing Calliope still makes love in public (the flying public) and requires a stop-start pattern of marriage songs, blizzard, and dance.

The lines break up around Clio's supplicant remains. Polyhymnia I admit was arrested after the bombing of atomic plants, and there was loss of memory preventing her escape to the heliport. She was handcuffed, taken into custody under the Baker Act. If meaningless imagery had been more vulnerable it may not have mattered she created havoc in the lobby area, knocking over chairs and a table, ripping an Our Lady of Hope poster off the wall.

Did Euterpe get paid for that?

No, no one pays for Euterpe's "assemble of pomposity." Her comment has been removed.

My point is... Paul Muldoon and crew exact dignity in rebuttal... they sound like my mother Thalia. Or Urania. She and.

We the vicitmized (the ephebes in corresponding clouds) tried to remind Polyhymnia rules protect everyone but she believed in conspiracy. Theater in this deep mirror. A light snow performing buthoh. She called the FIB & they sent a helicopter to the rescue, but the others wouldn't let her get to the rooftop heliport, which does not exist.

The official lines end here and feeling becomes something else.

2/12/09


New trope of the hour, Gail Collins says for 2009 old is in. Citing recent precedents, Mickey Rourke, Robert Plant, and the amazingly cuddly sleepy-eyed 70-year-old Sussex Spaniel, Stump, winner of the Westminster Kennel Club best of show, Collins has a point. Best example, Hank Aaron pulled out of the freezer like a ham, the nation's homerun straight arrow again since younger contenders after Aaron have been over-enhanced. So, hurrah for these rebounded granddads and hoarse retreads from yesteryear ... except in poetry as in pornagraphy it's still going the other way. Face it. The younger the better. (Surgeon General's Warning: Ethical and esthetic boundaries pertain.)

This hardly means the demise of writers past 40. Writers age differently. And they never grow old on the page if they know how. The same rules have applied since the beginning. We have to write and keep writing like 13-year-olds (or even younger if you're after a demographic that takes everything in intuitively), that's all. Some of the most senior and even the dead among us show how it's done. Zukofsky is young but he seems adult compared to Elmslie, Stein, Cerravolo. Bishop is naïve enough and brilliant about it, but I'll first take Notley, Spicer (who can seem too grown-up, too, so maybe cohorts and precursors like O'Hara, Schubert...), Ashbery. Ashbery! Can you approach a medium-length or longer poem by John Ashbery and not expect to be whacked by his teenage brain? Other avants, language and after-language ppl, processuals-conceptualists of every stripe, all of us have never written so goofily, so adolescently as Ashbery in "Farm Implements and Rutabagas in a Landscape." You know, I don't want to limit my argument to tokens of essentialism, but ageism needs its detractors fully equipped. A black-toothed icon like "Farm Implements" brings poetry down to its screeching youth, a time and place it should never relinquish.

Journalism trope of the hour, technology's fingerprints.

2/11/09


Real off center. Requires teethmarks.

Valentine's this year is shaping up. It's cool to get a bear-gram and an armed robot mini from Hater 1 and Hater 2! Leechvideo sent over a short list of Birdwalk clips that show they're influenced by hands-on literary studies. That's cool too. And coolest, this pre-owned fuzzy pajama top from Goodwill that a tongue-in-cheek friend fed-exed me this morning. Thanks, guys.

2/10/09


No plan is perfect. I have nothing to add to that. Did anyone else hear about the woman who led police on a low-speed chase while driving a U-Haul?

You usually find just awesome service from an old lady. So don't piss off seniors! This time she refused to go along with the rules. She still hasn't figured out why she's restricted to a world without suffering that can't exist.

It is sad we are now separated.

A friend who leaves for a long journey cannot be created nor is she destroyed as soon as the word "GAL-IXY" jumps out.

It's even sadder to think in a while this becomes irrelevant. The Navbar is real and terrifying. Nonconformity of the whole brought to a boil makes crazies!

And does the festival in the run off trample on our rights in other ways? We gather to answer this question and simply the idea of autumn that a boy plays with a flag, a Palestinian boy plays with a Hamas flag. This is why wormholes reject us though there are add-ons with incursive bludgeons as to how a wormhole is merely less sensitive to oblivion.

2/9/09


Bad futures are constantly replaced by hopeful updates. Here's one about poetics opening itself to new mergers of practical and technical knowledge. Dale Smith writes, "And by the new I mean new perspective — not necessarily form. That make-it-new thing is not just located within a formalist machinery, but in a living body of thought and practice that we, as poets, engage in."

Now that everyone has spoken — from fans and foes of irony at [lime tree] to speculators in between at Possum Ego — everyone, that is, who has had something to add, theoretically, and has made her case via blog posts and/or filling up comment boxes with regard to running for class president of poetry, disaster-era semiotics, and other near-anarchic aspects of hesitation and uncertainty in verse — maybe we can turn to concrete reportage? Please, more porridge on the following.

The Trade Books with Fine Art Covers exhibit of over two dozen designs at the Poetry Center Library now through March 7.

Cannot Exist reading, Jan. 29, at Bowery PC.

Boyer and Strickland reading, Feb. 4, at the Project.

Goldsmith & Torres reading, Feb 7, at Bowery.

Just asking.

2/8/09


Pulsing is the new blink.

2/6/09

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.
Am confused. Just having to capture the logic of America's recovery and reinvestment saga will do this to you. Barack Obama sponsors a stimulus that will take up to $900 billion or so, a big plan; he gets House democrats to draft it and they do, without republicans, but as a gesture to once-and-future (they hope) kissing cousins the dems toss in $300 billion in tax cuts; Obama pours tea and coffee for John Boehner ("o my god") and John McCain ("country first") to massage them coming onboard yet, thank you, they exit fleeing in the other direction; something's going awry for days after as Obama watches opinion polls slip for his plan while he's forced to defend nominees under fire for past-due taxes ... just as opponents find their voice defining the plan as pork; meantime, to bring a new level of crossed purposes into view, yesterday Senate compromisers, 'centrist' democrat Ben Nelson and 'moderate' republican Susan Collins, try their hands at stripping funds from the plan for state and local governments, education, Amtrak, cutting the plan by $100 billion; Obama flies Air Force One for 30 minutes last night to Williamsburg, VA to campaign among partisans (House democrats who have already approved the plan), but this is more a public relations initiative to appeal to the broader base of American voters, no doubt seeding new misgivings among moderates and centrists in Congress, making compromise all the more elusive; the jobless rate rises today to 7.6%. The jump in unemployment will bring democrats and maybe a couple of republicans back to the stark reality of economic collapse, according to the journalistic script, and Obama will have his stimulus with or without bipartisan support. We'll see. If so, the debate then moves to whether this has been (a) truly a bipartisan outreach on Obama's part and (b) whether bipartisanship is worth the effort. That self-involved debate colors our politics for days or weeks and distracts us from preparing for new havoc in international banking and commerce, much higher unemployment here, new US financial rules (negotiated with China), more stimulus talk, less healthcare reform talk, incremental (and minimum) green energy investments, government securitizing mortgages to benefit the system (mortgage lenders), republican gains in 2010. Am confused.

2/5/09


Here are 8 random things about me and how I hide my bad taste in anime music videos. These are tricks I recommend with an iPod or any personal videoplayer.

1. Smoothbore ambush. When listening to The Wiggles, I pocket my instrument and walk briskly around the office or living room so the sound isn't restricted to one area and everyone else gets a piece but doesn't know where it came from. You have to be careful when you do this. Don't stop until the full playlist, including Kill You by Dethklok, has been expelled from your pants.

2. Focused fly-by. I scout out an area in the office or my housing situation before firing up Taarna and Sammy Hagar. I walk around and check for other anime addicts. If there are any, I leave and come back again after lunch.

3. Courtesy flush. I run to the nearest bathroom and flush the toilet once Lupin the Third starts. This reduces the amount of airtime the video has to stink up the office or apartment.

4. Walk around in denial, banter. This works when you're "alone-together" (housemates or colleagues out of sight, in the wings). The instant I select favorite I also begin talking to myself; I try walking from the sofa or chair, to a nearby window, then to a doorway checking if anyone is coming in; and I repeat the cycle while Steal Princess, Rogue's Whip keeps playing. This can be a calamitous strategy if a Demon Puff shows up and tries to bust me. It's best then to pretend Steal Princess does not exist.

5. The Demon Puff. If someone at home or at work doesn't realize I'm in my own space and tries to force the door open while Petting College Girls is fast forwarding, I remain where I am until the Demon Puff leaves. This is one of the most shocking and vulnerable moments when watching personal anime where others lurk. If you stick to your guns and stay put, however, Demon Puff will get the message, and you will avoid uncomfortable eye contact.

6. No big deal. You're in a very public place, an elevator or hallway, for example. You accidentally press the arrow for Mighty Ravendark and several loud notes slip out at a machine gun pace. Don't panic. Turn the horned almighty down or off and remain where you are until everyone else exits. This way you'll spare everyone the awkwardness of what just happened.

7. Cough cough. A phony cough alerts all new entrants into my area that I'm watching Persona 4. This can be used to cover-up The Murders, Transfer Student, Rainy Midnight, and Yellow World.

8. Work those toes. A subtle toe-tap can be used to signal potential Demon Puffs that you are occupied. This will remove all doubt who's in the shadow of the Darkthrone.

2/4/09


Brain damage is in the eyes. Brain trust damage, too. You can spot the bounce in his retinas when Barack Obama screws up and he's forced to deflect our attention. In retrospect, hadn't it been clear to transition executives, the real screwballs, a criterion for the New Ethics in Government would be to pay taxes? A sprawl of voices in my head congratulates our leftist colleagues on The NY Times editorial board for tackling this huge moral hazard, issuing marching orders to Tom Daschle. It's not every day (we don't think) we'll have the chance to see the liberal media, under the guise of objectivity, do the heavy lifting for big pharma and the investor class. As the story line shifts incrementally from hope to doubt, capitalists and their playthings, the media, including The Times, are out to inflict further damage and bring Obama down a notch. Limo service and chauffeur taxes aside, we were told Daschle was uniquely qualified to steer health care reform through Congress. This no longer applies. Submit a caption: Obama screwed up, a cartoon pattern that is beginning to hold in public reception to his recovery-stimulus package now under repair in the Senate. Meanwhile, Obama asserts that this is not a time for profits and big bonuses. In turn, the same government-subsidized forces of hypocrisy that feign outrage at Daschle's $140,000 tax snafu are pissing in their Snuggies over Obama's order to limit bailed-out bankers to $500,000 salaries. Cable news loudmouths, like Jim Cramer, who earn high incomes at the behest of capitalists demur. For sure, Obama's salary cap is nothing substantive, another deflection. It's an overtly populist appeal from Obama, symbolic medicine to go along with more bounce in the retina to unscrew the damage.

2/3/09


A good number. Come to think of it, among the poets I love, for real, a good number of them are ex-Catholics and/or dyed in the wool Buddhists. Same with those I love at a distance, like Ryan Trecartin (see below), George Romero, and John Waters. (I don't know if Cindy Sherman is or ever was a practicing anything; her opus is Buddhistic.) The hysteria in all their works has religion, a matter of faith that fades away or dies. Once there was something out there (childhood?) swelling up around these guys, and in early sexual encounters it got intense, surged, and took off, causing more illogic and internal hysteria to pour up but mostly plunge, embarrassing and yet it's a rocking house party, like losing both death and life, dropping your pants, breaking water gushing down on your legs and heels and further down under the ground. In those terms, there are the visual poets I've mentioned, singling out Ryan Trecartin however for special mention, because he has poetry, he just wants to stylize your head for his online, to match his vision — here's another clip, labeled I-Be Area (Pasta Locker to JAmie's Area), to back this up further.

In addition to the visual poetry of filmmakers and photograhers, there is a textual poetry of hysteria brought on by religious fervor cum death. It could be, come to think of it, this is the only strain of genuine American romance. Obviously, I'm not talking about a soiled grab bag category like American sublime. I'm thinking about a Lost Sublime That's Dead to the Touch. Maybe, alternatively, The Fucked Pioneer. It might start with Emily Dickinson, just as American sublime does, but it takes us subterraneously to darker, greener, more wholesale hells and chat rooms we like to think of as ours, now.

2/2/09




Poets George Romero, Cindy Sherman, John Waters — each to the utmost of her paradigm, concepts, pep, and atomized abilities has come up with visual info that's more compelling than data we poets capture, re-capture, and/or write down as text. (Double dare: prove me wrong.) Add to the visual poets list video artisan Ryan Trecartin, featured in the Sunday Times Arts & Leisure. He pulls off the splintered equivalent of tribal truth-telling in this short clip from I-Be Area. There's nothing in poetry today that comes close, nothing that can declare and convey, I'm not allowed to play because of my past...uncontrollable forces. Yes. What can I do? I know how I feel now...I am waking up. I'm on your side. I am temporary.

Chuck in 3-D. You're off the island.

1/31/09


Two-faced Janus has exited with a sneer pointed in the direction of bright persons of certain merit and acquired outlook, cut-and-pasters, textual connectivists, and other dedicated tech practitioners of The Craft. Irate avantists had to persevere for up to an hour Saturday without recourse to Google as their usual, trusty search engine / comp bot / wing man broke down this morning, issuing bogus safety alerts and dead hyperlinks to hungry appropriation artists, e-poets in need of stump words, and anyone else looking for a fast fix of text off the web. "I don't know how I can take a risk right now without Google," said Emile Durkheim while the search engine went offline, "I have that sinking feeling going from plagiarized distortion to distorted plagiarism. You know, plagiarism in quotes." Durkheim, an e-list updater and, along with his life partner W. S. F. Pickering, author of innumerable pamphlets, t-shirts, and graphic hand towels developed from mining the internet, is prominent among a growing number of arts bookers and administrators dependent on internet tools not only to communicate but also to be. Tension lifted by Saturday afternoon once Google pulled strings and re-fired tubes giving new hope to the discourse-starved aggragated in all quarters and sectors on the planet where WiFi and everything coming through it are person-given rights of artistic personhood.

1/30/09


I'm marking the update, along with the comment box and links to four additional posts by Gabe Gudding, as archival material in the mon-Bourdieu-outdiscourses-you ______. (The blank requires your filling in a noun phrase, such as translational kerfluffle.) All together, the update contributes to the debate about everything phoned in in poetics. As does this from Anne Boyer.

Paid to be friendly.
At the center an oculus. The I.
Moving forward.

1/29/09


I admire Katie Degentesh's The Anger Scale for it's serious humoresque, not entirely self-knowing. Much of the wit submerged in cunning queasiness, vapors of unbalanced tones and transparent methods, it finds a ratio of constitutive disharmonies, method and tone sticking out unobsequiously to enfold showmanship within an immediate and addictive bearing on the present. V. Joshua Adams captures impressions like these and raises only a small measure of doubt about their utility in Chicago Review.

Worth a mention. Segue Reading w/ Eileen Myles, Rodrigo Toscano, Christina Strong, Laura Sims, Lawrence Griffin, Rick Burkhardt, Thom Donovan, others. Launch of Cannot Exist #4. The notice reads, in part, that the zine, edited by Andy Gricevich, is "devoted to overlap between politics, philosophy, and poetry." Who doesn't need overlap?

Bowery Poetry Club
Sat., Jan. 31, 4 to 6, 308 Bowery

Internet Aliens

Ballet's focus keeps an eye out
Watching us spin like sentience
Stuck in the happy medium

Sweetness itself catching everything
To give cause to baby Mozart
Squawking about cognition in opera

Who's moved parts from minor projects
Observing very little community,
Clumsifying long hours of letting be

Freezing hands into claws, which
Is why he should reserve dissonance
To guard shapes of light and volumes

Nested within a keyboard to determine
The performance.

1/28/09


The Washington Post will kill its Sunday book pull-out in a couple of weeks. Further proof of the diminution of print media. Artless reduction for figure and ground, newspapers and books.

To recap. The gotcha moments. Banter about an e-list, some of whose members lay claim to procedures and attitudes that thousands* already got. The commonplace as ribald proprietorship. Steps one, two, three, four, five.

*Gabe Gudding suggests the range is dozens. Gabe may be right if we were to stipulate procedures in sets or as an ensemble to describe a process, but the broader point is web-mining is a discernible practice for a number of poets, not just a few on an e-list or two; using the internet to cull vocabulary, shift tonal registers, elaborate and emend text has been a widely adapted process feature for a number of years. As for attitudes, there is no critical evidence that argues for anything new or exclusive in this regard.

1/27/09


George Schneeman, RIP.

1/26/09


Are they saying the same thing? Chögyam Trungpa intones First thought, best thought; George Balanchine, Don't think, just do. Both mean and don't mean what they say in specific contexts. The meaning / no-meaning problem buries itself in applications: a first thought in Trungpa's belief system is already problematic in that thinking (or not-thinking), even when it's "first," impedes being (and other incidents not attached to being); while Balanchine wants physical movement to function over, far above mental representation of movement, but one thinks on the way up to execution. Both statements — first thought, don't think — are fine examples of the layers in which meaning deploys non-meaning and, of course, simultaneous perception of opposite outcomes.

1/24/09


George Perle, RIP.

1/23/09


Dream within limits. What do we do here at pantaloons? We tease out opinions on how language gets done in poetics, poetry, politics, other redeeming or nutty enterprises. We ply language for several affects. We're not so interested in dreams. But once in a while we can't help ourselves, like this morning when we woke from a flash within a dream of such gruesome practicality we were distressed. I was, somehow, in search of tortured performance glamour, visiting a nice sports-transition store. No deeper pretext or prelude. I am in this nice, really dark place. The lights were out. But there I was casually shopping along with other guys. The shop was like Under Armor where mannequins, staff, and customers match up wearing comfortable, form-fitting shirts and sweats and sometimes jackets pulled a quarter inch back, almost off their collarbone, not to flex but to suggest upper body development. In other words, there are steadfast figures and outlines but nothing shows. The men have eyes and the mannequins don't move. That kind of carefully lunatic store. What am I doing here in this economy? That was what I was thinking as I picked out five pairs of socks. A pointillist grey pair, two pair in enlarged, graduated chocolate pixels, and a couple of pairs in black, one with a hint of a blacker digital plaid overlay. Everything was going to blend with my other clothes. (So what was the point, acquistion-wise?) The total came to under $200. Dreamers can translate the effects of geopolitical transparency into overlapping layers of desire, textured fantasy, aimless expectation. We call this shopping.

1/21/09


You cannot outlast us. That's the sound bite. Obama's been reading intelligence briefs and signals to us, sternly, there's more mayhem to come. He's not frightening us, he's stating the position clearly. Terrorists are out there and we have them surrounded, we win no matter, no apologies for what we are or how we live. A male dare packed into somber oratory about reclamation and the journey. At the moment we thought he might soar, Obama chose to tamp down the language. Emphasis on work, government that works. Responsibility. Common dangers. Swill and blood stains in the snow. George Washington crossing the Delaware for Christ's sake. Icy currents for four years.

~~

Competing egos from Harvard Law. Chief Justice Roberts overstepping bounds, Are you ready...senator? Roberts was not gracious, interrupting Obama when he began the oath at a point where Roberts had paused, forcing Obama to start over. Roberts twisting the word order of the middle part, misplacing the adverb faithfully, administering the oath without the text, a fabulously flawed performance.

~~

Senators Byrd and Kennedy, dueling invalids.

~~

A review stand that emptied well before the middle of the inaugural parade. Obama, his wife, and Biden stood alone. On television you could read the names of the guests that fled the cold. Signs on chair backs for "The Joint Chiefs" were prominent.

--

Beyond discussion: inaugural poem, Rick Warren's Christian invocation, Joseph Lowery's racy benediction, John Williams's schmaltzy "Air and Simple Gifts" (though it was good to hear the players, particularly Anthony McGill).

Improbable hat, Aretha.

1/20/09


The incision continues in this vein.

1/19/09


Look, I like several aspects (I think they're aspects) of what's being assailed here, but I'm roped in by what's absorbingly expressed: "Everyone on the internet is feeding the same machine." Here's this week's most direct argument for collectivity, maybe the winner in the direct argument category for all of January. Our time and our functioning within it, we should remember, no matter how adaptively understated or how closely observed, are imaginary. Shamans, dead-end kids re-inscribed as dead-enders? I don't know, maybe that's my crowd. I'm filled up with nervously charged prosaism. Hard-drinking, thrice-kissed.

Sexual dynamism. It's a quarterback problem.

1/18/09


My takes on 13 guys raising temps at Joe Brainard's Pyjamas: 1. Seth Green… cute when he cries, yet sorry, no. 2. Daniel Bedingfield. He's only good looking. "I don't want to run away." Really! 3. Seth MacFarlane, ok, the beefcake pattern has been set. Prosperous Midwestern beauty, granted. Nice dialect. 4. Jake Shears. Now you're talking. "I've been playing games since I was five." Ta Dah! 5. Annie Lennox. Her website's latest news is dated 10.03.08. No further comment. 6. Mika. Ok for a virgin. 7. Darren Hayes. Of course. Back to midcountry. Slutty voice. 8. Jamiroquai, much better. Mad scientist type. 9. John Mayer. Right now his singing goes nowhere. Can he learn how to swing inside? Doubt it. I'd like to shave his head and feed him gluten. 10. Lloyd Cole, the missing New York Doll! Bless her. 11. Neil Tennant. Something for seniors. I get it. He's beautiful. 12. Giovanni Ribisi, the best! a scientologist, even! 13. James Van der Beek looks like a model. Head with no moving parts.

The wind corridor — blithe!

1/16/09


A disheartening bone yard of axioms supposes its completion. Angels get stopped and adjust like the pumpkin marsh turned shrine–y meadow. I give up to appease you.

1/15/09




Disenvowled chapter e (selections) by Christian Bök — inspired by (but not copied from, exactly) Cecil Touchon's procedures outlined at dbqp. Link below. (Very nice.)

Very nice.

1/14/09




The 1970s appear to be within reach, jeans with a slight flare, mustaches, medicinal marijuana. It's a parlor trick we pull off collectively. The 2000s, that's the decade we're about to exit, attach readily to the 20th century. That's because this persists as the unpronounceable, unprecedented decade that wills to fold itself into other time (and let's admit it, the sooner it folds the better for our future). For the moment, the 2000s belong to the past century, the still-tangible, once-thought-progressive hegemony of information-based, meritocratic multiculturalism, advanced by science and the languages of science, programming and English. As for our connection to the past and timelines moving forward, however, it's absurd that the 1980s and 1990s seem within walking distance. They aren't. Within hours the first January of the twenties, starting with 2020, will be closer than January 1998, and the farther back we walk, the colder the blast. The 1970s are several long hikes up and around then down a K2 heap, a product of stylistic and political shifts over four decades, tectonic shifts.

In Milk Sean Penn wears all his decades well. He plays gay community organizer Harvey Milk at age 40 in 1970 moving forward, leaping into prominence toward the end of his life before he is gunned down in his late 40s. The film welcomes us to queer consciousness 101, and it takes us back to the era when gay men and women invented their communities by organizing them, investing livelihoods and their lives to stroll a few city blocks of the Castro alone or together as they are. (Or as they were, few or no gym rats among the boys, women who needed to butt heads with male counterparts just to get cranking, politically.) Director Gus Van Sant produces both a biopic shaped around a singular rebel and a starkly entertaining exposé of communal forces, blending archival film and newsreels with theatrical representation of Milk, younger comrades in arms, and numerous adversaries. It's chilling to view kinescopes of Anita Bryant in her prime declaring her Christian love for gays. Bryant's parallel to our own Rick Warren comes to mind. Similarly shocking, Milk is shown fighting and prevailing against Proposition 6, a California ballot initiative to root out homosexuals in public education, sponsored by national anti-gay forces. Had Milk only lived to present day, he may have made a difference battling last year's Proposition 8 repealing homosexual marriage, funded by Latter-day Saints. Reconsidering Milk today prompts reevaluation of how un-fecklessly and how far from a neutral distance we have come in affording homosexuals rights and respect. After 15 years of one form of such neutrality, only now with the new Obama administration is there the prospect of dismantling official military policy that enforces silence on homosexuals in service, so reevaluation of where we stand is much more than an exercise or academic ideal. Even today when an accomplished straight poet snickers at the idea of seeming gay, we as a community seem unknowingly stuck in the past, in bed with our own adversaries, ourselves. As artifact, Milk brings what has long since passed closer to our time. It's a deception that registers for something more attractive soon.

1/13/09


Dear Barack Obama:

There's a speech watch. It's been building over a few months, as you know, and with one week to go before your inaugural oration it's now calculable. I can't remember when so many — a multitude — will be hanging on rhetoric.

It will be exciting if you keep it short. That's the first order, as it were. And let's hope specifics are kept in tow. A pile-up of details would muddy the occasion. Rather than reach for punch lines, design one or two views into the future, frameworks we might call them. That will be splendid. We're expecting memorable lines, sound-bites that are supposed to be remembered but may not go over. So, keep these to a minimum, please. Or it may be adventurous if you don't even try. Grant us a communitarian and jaw-dropping glimpse of tomorrow to celebrate history. Our place in it. That's all, for now.

1/12/09




Slumdog Millionaire employs three actors apiece to tell the life stories — childhood, adolescence, young adulthood — of three Muslims who grew up in the slums of modern Mumbai. The tale is a convoluted but whole account bubbling up in flashbacks and contemporary frames featuring brutal interrogation, childhood endangerment, and a quiz show, everything gurgling, pulsing exhaustively to a hustle-and-smooch climax — liberty and happiness — in the closing credits. British actor Dev Patel, of Indian descent, plays the post-adolescent Jamal, the hardened but unwavering protagonist who has escaped the megaslum to work as tea-server in a Mumbai boiler room (where phone bashers pitch family plans to housewives in the UK). Jamal winds up, improbably, as a magnetic game show contestant, a huge favorite of the masses watching the Indian TV version of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? It's providential for Jamal all the questions he's asked on the way to winning his fortune happen to connect to his hard life experiences. It's a narrative gimmick that good writing and directing can begin to bring off. British screenwriter Simon Beaufoy, who gave us The Full Monty, re-invents the breakneck pace and violence of the Maharashtra underclass and underworld, along with the faster rhythms of young people who struggle to be winners today, running away from all that. English-Irish director Danny Boyle (28 Days Later, The Beach, Trainspotting) charges his mostly youthful, mostly Indian cast with the humane task of showing restraint in a world with no holds barred, creating an ensemble of players whose emotions and physicality seem to smolder as the story almost goes up in flames. Thank goodness Jamal winds up with Latika, his boyhood love played by the Mangalorean model and TV personality Freida Pinto. More thanks to Boyle's decision to gather these two and the rest of the cast for the film equivalent of a curtain call during credits at the end. Out of their characters, they swagger. Dev Patel, a Taekwondo world champion, and Freida Pinto, an Indian fashion icon, embrace, romp, and trance-freeze over "Jai Ho," a song by A. R. Rahman I translate as "Hell, yeah." Opening lyrics I truncate and adapt here from a literal English translation: "Hell, yeah, I walked on fire and got you. I've lost my life. Hell, yeah."

Slumdog Millionaire was nominated for and last night won all four categories at the Golden Globe Awards, best original score, best screenplay, best director, and best picture (drama).

1/9/09


My girlfriend is ticked.

She's an irate Democrat. And I can empathize with her and Paul Krugman's disdain for the type of stimulus measures Barack Obama outlined yesterday in his speech at George Mason University. It's fair to say, with respect to shifting to the center / center-right, all the signals are flashing olive green — that's flashing for undue, indeed, untoward caution — and that's olive for the color of the branches he's piling up on the GOP side of the aisle. Republicans can never resist a tax cut, and roughly $300 billion of Obama's $600-800 billion stimulus will come as credits to taxpayers and to businesses for new hires. The rest of the stimulus will go for promoting broadband expansion, digital medical record keeping, shovel-ready public works, and quick-fix green initiatives such as new insulation for public buildings. Does that sound like dramatic action? "Obama's plan is nowhere near big enough to fill [the] 'output gap,'" Krugman writes in today's NY Times. (The output gap, according to Krugman, is the difference between national production capacity and what is actually sold.) In other words, what Obama proposes, dealing still in generalities, covers too little ground to move more goods, promote more services, and ameliorate dire economic challenges like 7.2% unemployment hurtling down on us. Most of what Obama wants is familiar turf, tax giveaways, already-proposed public works. Tepid ground, we might say, from the perspective of most unemployed and imaginatively anemic in comparison to more leftwing initiatives once at the top of Obama's wish list, universal health care and green energy R & D, initiatives that will advance both short- and long-term social wellbeing.

To achieve the illusion of bipartisan support for what might be described as stopgap spending writ large, Obama dangles billions of dollars in tax cuts to triangulate a few recent converts to budgetary discipline (read, Republicans) to join his side, but he risks losing more than a few of us who prefer his holding up the wish list now, proposing the big, expensive ideas while public approval is on his side, even if results prove partisan. Democrats can do this if Obama will let them.

Girlfriend and I are holding tight.

1/8/09


Don't know. Find this week's meme, embarrassment, spooky. Anything can be recouped and mined, surely. But isn't it a little belated for chilling anthems and a textual movement motivated by shame, awkwardness, discomfiture, popping zits? Oh, zits. I'm spooked by the half-heartedness and the half-thought-outness.

Jamie Reid praises Billy Little, archivist, publisher, friend of poets, poet.

1/7/09


It's a sign of anarchy when Senate Intelligence Committee higher-ups Dianne Feinstein and Jay Rockefeller are summarily reduced in stature by Obama staffers coordinating with junior senators while commentators, such as Rachel Maddow, wield authoritative arguments to support a turnaround at CIA. Never camera shy, Feinstein breathlessly questioned the skills set and lack of Agency experience of director-designate Leon Panetta, once the first word of his likely nomination filtered up from Ron Wyden, a lower ranked member of the Intelligence Committee that Feinstein chairs. With Obama publicly advancing his choice for CIA, firmly defending Panetta in face of criticism, Feinstein backed off her remarks within hours. This case of loose mouth is an embarrassment, since Feinstein's questions about Panetta are posed in the context of her having acceded to current antiterror protocols like severe interrogation methods and rendition. Obama seems to mean it when it comes to upending CIA's pat bureaucracy that looks soft-politico at Langley and roughhouse at the margins (everywhere else). Almost as promising, he seems ready to swat down competing agendas that don't measure up to his forms of anarchy.

Flipping sides, Feinstein's backing of Roland Burris as the appointed senator from Illinois moves her perception game forward, moaning, feisty and, in this instance, correct. Or mostly. She also chairs the Senate Rules Committee and according to her reading there's nothing on the books that would prevent Burris from assuming his seat in the Senate. The only hang-up might be how the Illinois Supreme Court rules with regard to the state secretary's endorsement. The moving parts of the Burris controversy are in Illinois, then, oro forensis. Speaking of the politics here, I'd think Feinstein is ahead of others, a quick rebound from her Panetta blunder.

Back to the perception game, Rachel Maddow is fast becoming the go-to rhetorician to explain and expand on Obama's anarchism. I just love that she's taken possession of the Republican catchphrase elections have consequences in answer to mumblings from right and center. During the presidential election cycle no sensible Republican would submit to her blistering Q & A style. This prompted her to deal nearly exclusively with lefties, first as she guest-hosted on a range of MSNBC shows, and then after she landed her own cable program late in the campaign. Along the way she must have won the trust of Obama's communication staff as she seems often the first and the most eloquent, the most specific re-teller or, ok, spinner of new policies for change. The one-sided conversations during the campaign, enforced by the GOP blackballing her on-air efforts, have worked in her favor, as she has honed lines of argument to an essential brevity that persuades, because her language reflects intelligence staving off cant, engaging with steely particularity.

1/6/09




First there was Barbar. Cretin, evil colonialist, when he donned whiteface, it was time for ridicule and games (l'art populaire). Barbar was distinguished not so much by showmanship as by his underhanded chic (bisexualité que la position de repli). What a big schnazz he had. Then there are the pre-endowed toys of Teletubbies, the BBC's reach-out to the world of rainbows and inflamed proclivities. I fear for any straight child within their fun-house grasp, cuddly, flamboyant balls of sorry-ass perversion.

Now there's Wall-E, a fuming sulfuric potion (confused identity, ambiguous purpose, sex change) poured over robotic operations, mis-tagged as kid's entertainment. The film's original song "Out There" says it out loud, meow! I'm feeling beautiful. Wall-E is a richly empathetic banged-up throwback, a trash compactor (could be from the Jetsons) roving over a de-peopled planet heaped in refuse, stranded in his/its blue-collar routine for 700 years, picking up tossed brassieres and make-up, listening to show tunes (hint, wink), the last employee on Earth. He/it runs from Microsoft Vista. From outer space enters Macintosh Eve, a legless streamlined dedicated gadget floating like a Swedish teardrop over waste. I'm calling it Eve, but name and gender are up for grabs. Wall-E calls it variously Steve, Reeve, Irv. Doesn't matter, Wall-E forces love that dares not speak its name onto it/her/him. Once Wall-E and Eve lift off from Earth, conventions in animation take over. Human beings have repaired to a spaceship that's nearly spotless, The Axiom, and like us they have become fairly relaxed shopaholics, only they're dealing with consequences after seven-plus centuries strapped into Ikea recliners, sipping tall blue colas, suffering bone loss. Little and midsize robots race around and cause panics (if they can). Airlock disposals and other inane contraptions on the big shiny mother ship are controlled by one more throwback, evil Hal. Though it's Hal after the bailout this time and its giant red glow and kinematics module are housed in a flimsy steering wheel. And it's a good thing, too, because when Wall-E and Eve assist the ship's captain (homo sapiens) snapping the wheel off, Hal dies. Humans can now return to their filth-ridden streets back on Earth while Wall-E and Eve run off to live their private desires. Evil. Pure evil.

1/5/09




Looking out, looking on — that's one dynamic that recovery from addiction deals in, a gluttonous, panoptic magnetism that woozily succumbs to cinematic overlapping. The centerfold of Rachel Getting Married is Anne Hathaway as Kym Buchman, sister of the bride. Hathaway emerges from the black-and-white credits self-absorbed, formidably at arm's length yet more darkly shadowed than anyone else in the first key minutes of the film, decamping from nine months of rehab in NYC, looking out from her father's suburban wagon as they speed toward Stamford in a blanched gauze of grays, greens, and doused flames of color. One pit stop for diet Pepsi later — Hathaway refused a diet Coke packed for the commute — the father-expeditor-of-good-feelings played by Bill Irwin (aka Mr. Noodle on Sesame Street) and the needy junkie step onto the wedding set, their mid-19th-century family home, for a weekend of multiple rooms and grounds for looking on as Kym, Rachel, and others' lives take hold. Rosemarie DeWitt as Rachel reclaims her father's attention — she's the one getting married, after all — and calls Hathaway down for ruining their past and making light of or fabricating the details to deflect criticism. DeWitt will have none of Hathaway's making 'amends,' and Hathaway cries back, "Who do I have to be now?" Hathaway's question plays out more terrifyingly the closer we come to the wedding and through the ensuing reception and party. DeWitt and Hathaway manage both to kill the music (an aggravating mélange of garage, Brazilian drums, and post-bop performed on screen well before and long after nuptials) and to see and behold the impasse they construct between them, punctuated by their mother's automatic flinches and retreat. The mother, played by Debra Winger, has remarried and arrives late and is among the first to exit the proceedings. It's a radical quality that puts the film viewer in Winger's shoes, arriving late to the de-synthesized catastrophe and needing to leave or at least to look away.

1/2/09


Getting back to dead binaries for the moment, I add Anne Boyer to the short list of bloggers reposing ideas around the six-inch-deep cavity of a vanguard of poets in opposition to them. Over the last two days Anne's method has been to mine sources. Reader, critic and, more infinitely refined, poet, she commences three brief references (three, so far) with Peter Burger's perception of an unresolved collusion between forces of an esthetic binary; then she cites Donald Sutherland's sanguine description of a fortuitous "animating force" in poetics to repurpose "stranded ideas" (ideas, as in concepts) "for another continuum (lyric subjectivity)... a perpetual 'fresh event.'" By round three, Anne turns to Gertrude Stein's song that notes "the little birds are audacious... [even as] they were not able to delight / In which they do." Anne's third reference comes across almost as a suggestion that Burger's skepticism and, more obvious, Sutherland's sanguinity are half-decisions that introduce new problems only a fresh event of poetry, such as Stein's, can demonstrate.

Fearing contact after fucking I found a penknife buried to the hilt in my ribs. The perverted part was how I occupied your emotional life, a joyrider's joyrider. The guardian part made this a better world with a whole splash of blood on my undershirt. It's for you.

~~

There's the sizzle of homeless autosuggestion in sex, climbing in the mist. I'm pointing to the blight of the neighborhood and placing bets, because I bring humor to this relationship, zipping up, looking wild in the frieze. The snow is still on the branches. Why does everything get attended to like a pageant? Why are birds wearing outfits that pay tribute to Neil Diamond?

~~

Before sex I thought about the white fragrance, watching my breath. Let's try it again without the comma it's always been. The whereness on the tip of the tongue. The perfunctory receding of the plane. Inside voices take two bites and want out, taking no steps at all, like freakouts testifying for tangled weaves of standard-bearers.

1/1/09


Binaries are dead. Long live binaries. If poetics-in-progress toward transparency in dissidence is what you think the first of January was invented for, you could do lots worse than Johnannes Göransson and Seth Abramson who both disturb the smooth functioning of The Avant v. The Other. Frankly, discussions like these call out for a Linnaeus sort or sorts, readers and critics equipped to reorganize and redefine the prevailing ditheism into its innumerable and underreported strands. New taxonomies could play a big part in poetics soon. A guess, we'll need a couple of saber-rattling anthologies to kick things off. (And the battle could be joined overnight on the Web!)

12/31/08


At every year's end I find myself plunging into lists, asking questions. What falls over the ditch? What's rotted so ready to lay it down? Fractious midwinter makes room for true snowfall. My greatest wish is to down flakes lost in their way like raisinettes with botulism, spinning machines gone iridescent while sketchy hacking out the details. O drum machines! Music in no order.

12/30/08


Yoga is so popular it's what it is everywhere, even in the bedroom. It's funny that such devastating existentialism is served at a fancy party.

In this one Nancy appears as an ashtray and the cowboys are spying on some other cowboys. Practice makes perfect.

Sometimes a partner can be deliberately and aggravatingly passive-aggressive. I'm kidding. I'm being sarcastic.

In making love, as in all things, "airy" is a terrible consistency for meatballs.

A friend reports they're reading dog waste at MLA.

In her mind you walked out on her blog.

Are you slapable? Am I? Hope so.

12/29/08




For To
Skip Fox
BlazeVOX 2008

I'm certain Skip Fox awaits the "mindful shimmer" of everyone's attention, dizzy but watchfully unbewildered; still, he's exacting, gee, golly...well, he must be pissed as he sits at his computer dashing off cris de coeur that do whatever the opposite is to rambling:
At what rate do you think, head down against the wind to weather it, whatever it is, from what notion of yourself (what box?) does it pour forth, from whence does it call, amid what welter, panties balled in confusion, or as a person sits, usually in a chair, to engage the light, luminous, the activity of ideas which dance about the room, around the table, books and that upon which you are sitting, I mean thinking, what do you think?
This is the first sentence, a "human mechanism," of about five in a piece titled "That's what I think at any rate." Except for Michael Gizzi, also unbewildered yet a big maybe when it comes to anger, there hasn't been a monologuist as fired up as Fox since Charles Bukowski whose own diction now and then needed a 5,000-mile testosterone check-up, come to think of it, just like Fox's.
Eat what You Fuck. Sticka for
a. cannibals
b. cattle ranchers
c. post-feminists
d. ADM
Fox won't let go of "vaguely accidental" thought, his own or that of others floated off in a "commonsense drift." Fox practices mixology, "Just took out the garbage. Talked to the horse and myself of premises, knots, and coordinates. We have testimony from Bernadette Mayer how much can happen even on the shortest day of the year." Mixed up sentences like these almost point to first-order conceptualism, before the schtick (and the Mayer reference is inarguably another pointer), but also a conceptualism broken into by particulate and self-deprecating humor, as "he was over-sensitive and stupid, not as rare as you might think or maybe you know all about this and only I am in the dark trying hard to recognize what we have in common, the personal." Fox goes on trying hard and succeeding in this mostly prose-poem "clarified as light" way, "having no blind spots only everywhere instead just light pouring thru..." well, not really, because he's always spinning around, interrupting: "Imagine a pear. A pert pair. That's my cracker." The blinking lights go on for 273 pages, "writhing in paroxysms of loathing," so it's a fairly large stigma and accomplishment, "due to ocular-brain-concurrence-function design." The moral is a life of design, "as fate designs, [ending] in something (arrive!), but disappears into a wisp." Further, we don't know "how our joints are packed into time," and our sensory apparatus, sight especially, keeps overcompensating, making nearly everyone's "horizon seem to rise as it recedes into the distance." Thus we're tricked at the get-go, by design or "[b]aited zero" or fate or "[l]eaky gusset of dawn ... It's coming soon. Relax." The trick leads one to further compensation, to drink or to poetry or to all three! as one is "drawn to stumble forth to the distraction of his being, a drunken gyroscope." No longer tricked.

12/27/08


More belatedness. I thank Don Share and Tom Beckett for their good words about pantaloons, even as I come across these words of mine that function, for now, as a statement of purpose —

Just because we attribute work to personality doesn't mean I'm not a brute with a hammer in my hand. My nailing us together takes a moment of your life.

Whatever takes substance and breadth, I'm not doing it!


12/26/08


Yeah. I know it's a little late for yule sentiment. So let's call it belated. It's a bitching image w/ text. Topnotch.

dbqb's write-ups for my webby xmases operate from that brainchild formula that converts one holiday into 12 to prop us up through the New Year. This is Geof's fifth response, making my Season's Greetings this year, like the others, a two-man show.

12/23/08


I hope the Bernsteins find comfort knowing that so many care deeply for them on the loss of their daughter Emma. This is one of those rare times when words seem useless. Memories, however, can save us. I knew Emma only from reading her enthusiastic travel notes and bright research ideas, which she posted on the Web. I had looked forward to her promising future as a substantial presence in the community of poets. I will remember her as a young poet, and I am sure that Emma will live a long time in many other people's memories.

12/22/08

12/21/08


Advice for the would be romanitic (sic): Just try to be simultaneous.

Romantic or romanticist?

12/19/08


Worth considering.

12/18/08


Where's the poetry in blogging? In the last week or so, Bird Cam Torsos; Marvin, the Changeling; Bent Jade; The Trouble with Diaghilev; Expedite the Gypsy-punks (including comments); Family Crest Adventures; Reverse Collarbone; Who's Helping You or Land of Darwin (12/17, e.g.); Riot Act, Nuanced; Bohemian Fashion; Fast and Loose; Buzzword Encore; A Pearl Browser; The Pace of Couch Production; It Gets Bigger, among others. All tones, spiked.

Tom Beckett reviews Brenda Iijima's Subsistence Equipment for galatea resurrects 11.

12/17/08


B. M. Audemars climbed into a corporate charter jet that would take him from his relative seclusion in upstate New York out to Culvert Passage, CA, where he grew up. He hadn't been back to Culvert in 20 years or so, and he was looking forward to the cross-continent journey with a mix of curiosity and trepidation. "I remember being afraid constantly — afraid for my life," Audemars said of his childhood in the 1970s. "I was the skinny kid in lipstick wearing maroon cords on the way to a writing class at Presbyterian Culvert, Reformed, in between a gang of college business majors with bow ties and another gang of art school fools in black shirts and vests, and it was like, "How did I want to get beat up today, smacked with calculators or acrylic spray?"

For those who know Audemars by his three, top-of-the-charts initials, BMA, the brown-eyed, wavy-haired Vonnage spokesman, gadfly rapper, chic culture critic, word-crazed cartoonist, and poet-trampoline-artist who's become a smiling regular on reality shows like "Top Money Workin' the Nonprofits," "The Biggest Appropriator," "Dancing with Marjorie" and his wild dating program on A&E, "BMA Gets It On, A&E," the notion of a rough upbringing — part Harvard-and-Crips, part "Bard Bicycle Thief" — might come as a surprise. But Audemars seemed genuinely anxious about returning to his hybrid of a neighborhood where he says he was beaten up on a regular basis by the future M. B./F. A. crowd.

"Punched in the face. Mugged. Robbed. Knives. Guns. The whole thing," he said. "I used to accuse my parents of not loving me for making us stay in a neighborhood where every other kid was richer and more entitled." After roaming the still-transitional neighborhood of tear-downs squeezed between shiny mansions (shiny in the rain) and so-called estates for an hour or so, he took a last look around before hopping back into the Lexus (with self-drying brakes) to return to his jet. "In a way," he said, "cultural critique kind of saved me from all this."

Except that it didn't — not, at least, if you're talking about the getting-beaten-up-on-a-regular-basis part. In a way Audemars is still that kid in the tight cords fighting off the taller, wealthy kids, only now the roving gangs hitting him up for his milk money are literary. For the knife-sharpening snark squadrons of Harriet and a segment of the poetic elite, he has come to embody the Faustian bargain of celebrity in the writing game. He is portrayed, and often satirized, as a supernaturally talented poet who squandered his gifts for television, rapping and, even lower, cartooning — literally and figuratively — in the scattershot pursuit of fame, fortune and pink ruffled shirts. "He's almost gotten to the point where people in the poetry world feel sorry for him and want him back," said Johnson Kant, a professional gambler and author who has written for The Southwest Springfield (IL) Racing News and Weather. "He's this really brilliant guy, poemwise, who's forsaken everything that he's good at for some things that he's not good at. And that makes me really sad, because he's such a phony bastard."

Last year, Kant and the Lily Foundation announced on Harriet that they would hand out Golden Yea and Yuck Awards to the celebrity poets whom they considered the best and the worst exemplars of that strange breed. Among the dubious honors was the BMA Special Mention, saluting the "worst career move by a talented but wasted reprobate." (To his credit, Audemars gamely showed up at the South Beach Yea and Yuck Festival and received the award in person, even though Kant had "mercilessly and enthusiastically made sport of BMA many, many times," as a spokeswoman for Lily put it in a blog entry.)

The word "sad" seems to surface a lot when you bring up BMA's curious career. "We were talking the other day, another poem-obsessed person and I, and we were just saying how sad it was that he has disappeared," said N. V. Greene, the grande dame of New York scribes, and one of the first to celebrate Audemars's talent just a few years ago when he was the poet du jour at Bowery Poetry. "I do believe that 'Dancing With Marjorie' is kind of the last stop. Someone said, 'Oh, he'll never be back, if he can make a living doing commercials, rapping on TV, and cartoons.' I don't understand — has he totally lost that passion to write verse? Because there are poets that don't like to write, that can't write, and they just want to be stars. How could somebody be so talented and so gifted and just write writing off?" That, Greene explained, is because BMA is now largely a celebrity nationwide. "BMA still is doing sarcastic New York poetry, and his stand up comedy for Bed, Bath & Beyond is mostly wonderful, if you see him here in Manhattan or not," she said. "But somebody like BMA, who is exceptionally gifted, seems to have thrown it all away — that's why close readers and people with grad degrees and career arcs are so upset about it."

As the trip to California made clear, BMA has had a freakish, prodigy-like understanding of poetry from the very start. The rich mélange of Culvert Passage, he said, is where he picked up the cross-demographic appeal that would later compromise his inner narrative and propel him to stardom as a rapper, cartoonist, and, of course, national poet. "I don't think there is more of a cultural clash that sorta says 'fuck you' in your face anywhere than in Culvert Passage, unless it's the whole country," he said. "I think in many ways my worldview on dumbed down diction and duh quick-laugh images was formed here."

As soon as the Lexus pulled up in front of a two-story red-and-white house at 148-01 90th Avenue, where five members of the Audemars family and several boarders lived before the Audemarses moved to safer quarters in the early 1980s, he became swept up in a rush of Proustian triggers. As he dashed around the neighborhood, his memories of its past squalor ("There was an apartment in every building that sold art supplies ... I should have paid more attention ... My friend Eddie lived right here, he OD’d on paint thinner...") were crosshatched, over and over, with memories of poetics. He pointed to a spot on Millionaires Avenue where he'd read his first Bukowski, a bite of the rich life, indeed, for him. He tracked down the tiny patch of dirt on 150th where an elderly Californian woman named Vita once scratched out odes to squash and tomatoes. He made note of the burnt-out McDonald’s that his father, Raffaele, used to forbid him to set foot in before he finished writing a new round of sonnets.

"Key Agency," he said as he approached a darkened wine shop with a street poet's workshop in the back where he got his first public, a place that's still operating at night. "I used to bag metaphors here." This dislodged yet another memory — of how the young BMA would pocket a few coins from his workshop job and dart down the street to buy tracing paper, mirrors, projection candles, and the latest Marvel comics that his mother, Nicolina, could boil down for him back home while he was dipping his pens into ink pots, drawing. "I was conflicted even back then. Words or stencils?"

He was 11 when he got a job at a pizzeria-writing sweatshop, a distinctively Californian combo, on Setting Boulevard; there he became obsessed with perfectly calibrating the balance between the nice language of culturally inclusive haiku and the bubbles in fountain soda. Tim Ballin Hand, who was one of BMA's instructors at Key Agency and is now the president of the workshop, said that his star student could leave a distinctive imprint even with others in his class but not in his league. "You could tell when he diced language versus somebody else," Dr. Hand said. "You could pick his out of a group effort."

To understand why Audemars is perceived as a wayward son of American letters, it makes sense to go back to his triumph in 2005, when he started his writing and cultural critique blog. (It closed down in 2007.) People who fell under the spell of his ideas then still compare Audemars to an upstart Marcel Duchamp, and they slip into a reverie when they summon up their first encounter with his tiny but epically colorful cartoons replete with visual and verbal puns and ribald social satire. New York magazine rhapsodized over drawings and BMA's other efforts this way: "Sweet, immensely ugly nudes step all over complacent white males who have abandoned their egalitarian principles, an essentialist tableau nuzzled in blobs of urchin buffoonery; and smarting of tenderness we could die twisting in those blobs, die for their glowing upturns as well as their pratfalls within an essence of brave open struggle and subjectivity to overcome darker disembodied forces. Audemars pulls off such esprit with a panoply of crackling noises, paradoxical images, and shrewd, implausibly Orwellian discourse that positively gooses us blog readers, plunging us into paranoia, parlous candor, and savagery that mediate between death and a close call. Do these sound like the delusions of a madman? In less capable hands, maybe; in Audemars's, it's pure Charlie Brown genius."

While it's hard to grasp why a 'genius' would feel compelled to mambo alongside hip-swivelers like Marjorie Madoff and Corneille Kennedy, it can be equally surprising to hear that in his blog writing heyday, BMA was thought of as too much of a word-tinkering recluse. "The funny thing is that at that time, my partners and everyone in my world of poetry were always telling me I'm too serious," Audemars said. "This is what is so mind-blowing to me, and beats me down. I was always too serious and too pure and didn't see the bigger picture enough and didn't understand that writing and the cultural critique business were entertainment. I needed to take it easy and do pieces that were simpler and made people happy. So fuck you." He was urged, he said, to put fail-safe poetics bait on the agenda, and make it simple — pieces like rapping out sounds from porn videos using only two letters of the alphabet, or writing and then shredding a real heroic biography into confetti, or overwriting the document of his rich grandfather's last will-and-testament with the bolder fonts of a Sam's Club coupon for women's panties, half-off. He wrote rib-tickling précis, yes, but even those brought out the obsessive formalist in him. "So I proceed to concoct the short pieces with the most ever prosodic elements known to man. My first fractured one-page précis had 200 or 300 literary devices in it.”

If there was a specific moment when the sun began to singe BMA's wax wings, that would have to be 2006, when he made his reality-TV debut in "BMA Gets It On, A&E," a video vérité chronicle of the flirtations and stove fires in his Manhattan date-hunting days. For viewers, and for the show's producers, things went swimmingly, which is to say they went really badly for BMA. He couldn't land a date. A perpetual skirmish between BMA and Jeffrey d'Automne, the entrepreneur who was funding the show (and who secretly wanted to date BMA himself), escalated into a flurry of litigation, with d'Automne suing BMA and BMA countersuing d'Automne and BMA eventually being barred from entering his own apartment subleased by d'Automne — while BMA's mother, a cast member of the show and a lawyer, was still writing litigation briefs for both sides at the kitchen table. It was quite a mess. "That was weird, wasn’t it?" Audemars said. "When you say it out loud, it's like, 'How is that possible,' right?" He went on: "I think I took a lot for granted. I think when someone puts seven or eight million dollars into a program with your own name on it, and that someone is special, someone who actually wants to date you, it's a pretty big deal. You can't just think, 'Well, that's what he's supposed to do!' I think I underappreciated a lot of what was happening to me. I should have paid more attention."

Dr. Hand of Key Agency met with his former student during that dark phase and offered advice. "I said, 'BMA, dust yourself off and get back into the writing-culture-culture-writing make'em laugh business,'" he recalled. "At that time he still had his blog. I said: 'That's a jewel. Throw yourself into it and that's what people will focus on.' And for whatever reason, he just didn't listen to me, he didn't friggin want to do that. And he stopped talking to me. This is my interpretation — he had lost the fire for that, and had bigger dreams and aspirations. What a Caruso! Or Crusoe!"

Asked about BMA's game plan, Dr. Hand said: "First, I could give a flying you know what. Second, he needs more exposure to the public to get them on the hook. That's where BMA's thinking bigger: 'How can I pursue my passion for rap and cartoons and convey my knowledge about what's gone down the butt hole in this friggin culture of ours along with my oh-so-purely-distilled expertise in verse — do all of this in a way that doesn't just reach a couple boys or maybe they're girls who call his number, but thousands, millions addicted to his blog by first watching him stumble, lose it, and fall apart on tv?'"

Indeed, "BMA Gets It On, A&E" marked a shift in Audemars's public identity. Within a few months, the meticulous wunderkind from Culvert Passage had turned into a poetry-show Zelig. These days he has his new A&E show, "Duchamp and Me," and a new book, also called "Duchamp and Me," a cross-promo that seems a mission statement — an attempt, perhaps, to merge the public and private and past and present BMA and get back to basics. In contrast to his near-psychedelic experiments with literary language at Bowery Poetry and nuanced art historical imagery in his first cartoons, "Duchamp and Me," the book, features word-image recipes that often hinge on hand-me-downs, such as a longer piece where he has retyped the entire Who's Who from 2008 backwards page by page and called it "Ohw Show."

Still, does the disappointment of the elite lit crown grate on him? "I try not to judge any assholes for how they feel," he said. "If I make a judgment about it, then it will lead to anger and resentment, and the brakes dry... I don't want to really go there. How about a poem?" The answer and the question carried a distinct echo of advertising and therapy. "Well," he said, "there's been lots of therapy. And I should pay more attention."

12/16/08




"I've come to save the Earth." As Sylvester Stallone is to cryogenetic monkeyshines, Keanu Reeves is to mezzo nihilism and acerbic motivation. Victim and player within a now-20-year-old whisper campaign and running joke, stoner / adventurer / declawed pet Reeves comes back down to metro New York in The Day the Earth Stood Still, risking everything, subtracting himself from the emancipatory normality of alien dominance to attain spectral consciousness funded by excellent evolutionary altruism. As the infinite's agent Reeves is not reckless, iniquitous, or anatomically complex, though monotone and slightly bulbous. Looped to the gills like a slower yet more unpredictable Rod Serling ensconced in knock-off Prada, Reeves distorts the status-quo down on the otherworldly streets. "Where are we going?" This or that way. I guess so. Not particularly. Earth is therein implicitly and really fucked. Devoid of message (except it's sort of mankind at bottom and to blame), nonviolent but smacked down by a tendentious superego, and retroactively inarticulate as a coordinate, Reeves has no place to go now, having never before taken on an impurely ad hoc humanist-passivist role, and so not getting to pass Go, not getting quite to collect his core. "It's interesting that mid-December turns out to be a nice time to release summer-style action movies," Reeves projects his frustration with the typecast sneering at the collapsed bug life and geomancy of earned vision and natural voice. "I've got to get back to the city." Why bother, Buddha imitator? guileless as a pious, ethereal hulk who's sneaked his junk across the border to snatch up options on Boardwalk and Park Place, now subject to foreclosure. What worked for Reeves in the 1990s and the early 2000s pertains — perennially other and oppressed, self-loathing sexually, still no green card.

12/15/08




Home Video Review of Books is a starter idea. Mounted as a first (and rather belated) refuge for poetics commentary in the age of YouTube, the rashness of these visual reactions to new books of poems is discernable. I say reactions, because this isn't a compilation of criticality in the form of reviews; it's a grab bag of video gifts supplied asystematically from the Web (so they're regifts!) to convey notes of spectacle, tenuous attitudes, and cute-as-a-puppy associations. (There's consonance in the clips for Lisa Jarnot and Dan Machlin. Visual data on Kasey Mohammad — now taken down — and, especially, John Godfrey are off base.) Poet-collaborators Mathias Svalina & Julia Cohen edited the Review to make one of or both opposable points: This concludes our conception of video imagery as a poetics at this time; stay tuned.

12/13/08




It's not a real Xmas w/out spiking the temperament w/ something like a bi-coastal-straddling-the-pond-six-geese-alaying-into-a-mushroom-cloud thought or two. Thanks, Tom Raworth! thanks for whipping together atrocities of the UK-US political zeitgeist — that's a fresh Sarah Pallin! and she's packing flanks of moose, and there's every Anglophone's First-Dude Gordon Brown! And Santa! Santa! in your sleigh so bright, are you bringing us a bailout or taking it away tonight?

12/12/08


It has come to my attention that a poem is science fiction or it is not.

It was nice to meet you and your idea.

12/10/08


Process. Tease near-misses out of what process could mean. Stipulate minutes and subroutines to withhold and then expose your meanings like beans in flower without frontiers. Don't talk with your mouth full. Process, in other words, phrases of process. Discuss the cut-off points where process will meet and obeisantly turns into habits that muddle on, neither wifely caricature nor whore. Talk about process components and the stiff, gnomic atmospheres to bring accoutrements to terms for process, and definitions of all this. Take care, and take your time, since to criticize another's process is effrontery she'll remember, but off the mark, much like disapproving a pianist's shoes. You can do this, feel free, but don't expect to be asked back to her kitten-infested suite. Likewise, avoid rejecting her criticism, keep the smart bomb under wraps, knock the moment down with glances, nods, and inspire small talk while keeping everything under surveillance. You look great together!

12/9/08


An appalling, transgressive feat. Governor and chief of staff echo against the blur of ramshackle politics. (Threatening, thus compelling sympathy toward Tribune Co., no less. See below.)

Sooner rather than later we're probably going to wonder what to read for daily news since the number of reliable, inarguably uncompromised print sources is shrinking. Twenty-five years ago one of two international newspapers of record in English, The Times of London, was folded into the News Corp., militant enforcer of oligarchy masquerading as a media holding company, headed by Rupert Murdoch. Two years ago, the premier U.S. financial paper, The Wall Street Journal, was similarly annexed by News Corp. Independent but stranded, for now, the other English-language world newspaper of record, The New York Times is said to top Murdoch's list of next must-do acquisitions. Meantime, The New York Times Corp. is weighing options such as mortgaging new headquarters in Manhattan to shore up finances as circulation and advertising revenues continue to spiral down. Like News Corp., if on a smaller, less provocative scale, The New York Times Corp. has been amassing other U.S. news properties in the southeast, California, and New England, and the results for readers are hardly benign. Once a second-tier national paper along with The Chicago Tribune, Philadelphia Inquirer, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, The Los Angeles Times, a few others — The Boston Globe has shifted focus more to regional rather than national coverage, and operates fewer bureaus with fewer reporters to compete with its owner of 15 years, The New York Times. There have been parallel downshifts in staff and coverage in most second-tier newspapers. Yesterday, the Tribune Co., holding company of both The Chicago Tribune and The Los Angeles Times filed for bankruptcy. This is bad news for newspaper readers everywhere. News blogging and cable broadcasting supplement and in some cases complement newspaper publication. But without a contest among first- and second-tier newspapers, that is, with print news manufactured by only a handful of holding companies, the essential documentation of our daily contents (our material satisfaction and discontents) turns radically deterministic.

12/8/08


It's not the most wonderful time of the year, btw. That would be six to seven months from now.

12/5/08


ready to marry
      the chopped
            off head


— CA Conrad



~~

A fear is haunting (whatever remains of) the contemporary Left: the fear of directly confronting state power. Those who still insist on fighting state power, let alone directly taking it over, are immediately accused of being stuck in the "old paradigm": the task today is to resist state power by withdrawing from its scope, subtracting oneself from it, creating new spaces outside its control.

— Savoj Žižek

12/4/08


For those, you, perhaps, and I, who are not up on how the divide can be played, today, Deeana Fong's pre-read video is exemplary. Divide? One part social mainstream, one part cool as nimble-existence-in-hell, although most of that cool is staging. (That's what Ron S. suggests, I think, in enforcing the divide between the avant and social mainstream — there is a poetry that's trail mix, so rhetorically vacuum sealed and narratively palatable anyone with a few years of advanced English in high school or better can crack it open and have some.) Fong's tv staging? Let's do it right here by the Bustelo in this I-could-care-about-food galley. The gestalt is to look urbanely offhand and sound normal. (You decide about the boyfriend's audible glee, clapping, etc. in the background.) The exposition, all around, is let's-not-make-this-elevated-or-fussy, but gawd let's get it done non-vulnerably. There's plenty of staging in the writing, too, where it's countable. A third of the way, when Fong says "Tell me about it," it's kinda clear that jumps in tone are deployed to signify irony and distance about, you know, every day for every one on the planet. When she says "You're much smarter than I am," Fong means at least a dozen things, socially. Sorry, "Let us celebrate with a vegan pot roast" is too domestic-witchy-much for me to swallow. And it's not St. Mark's Street. Just "the things I feel for you day in and day out" drives me crazy. Batwing crazy. (You decide. That will make things much clearer.)

12/3/08




Ted Greenwald
3
Cuneiform 2008

Here are the bizarre details, page 25, second stanza (of two).
Is it Peggy or Sue
I think I love you
Looking worldlessness
Remind me what's your name
Four lines capture the crucial goings-on in Ted Greenwald's 29th collection of poems: the pleasant complacency of clichéd language is upended, in this case in the deliberate problematizing of early rock 'n roll iconography, splitting chaste Peggy Sue in two; there is the shameless rhyming of Sue with the next line also ripped from the r 'n r songbook as is the last line; and there's the masterfully silly Line 3 that spins our entire cultural orientation on its heels, forcing speculation that the unstably-named Peggy, Sue or, in fact, Peggy Sue is not only worldless but looking into and out of the eerie, pathetic State of The Worldless. Welcome back.

And if you think page 25 is a lucky pick, turn to page 27, second stanza (of two).
Going to make a difference
Greens, cooling off
Projectile confidence
With birdsong
The first line is again boilerplate, a bloated participial (or gerundive) phrase uttered millions of times an hour; the second line, culinary description or acute art speak — either way greens are consonant with the brash birdsong in the fourth line. Once more, that odd Line 3 rips the 'scene' open, pitching its payload our way. It's not always so obvious that the third line re-orders each stanza, but frequently this is what happens, supporting one interpretation of the title 3. More satisfying is Ron Padgett's idea, blurbing that 3 "takes the mind in at least three different directions simultaneously..."

Another basis for the title is that the collection has three parts. Poems cited above are from "Going Into School That Day," pieces whose lengths alternate between eight lines on right pages and 14 lines on left pages, and which borrow "words of self-described redemption spoken by the late Salvador Agron," as Greenwald explains on his copyright page. (Agron was a gang member who killed two teenagers in Hell's Kitchen.) The two following sections contain pieces of parallel discourse strategy in different formats, "Anyway" with six-line verses, "Dawn On" with poems of 27 lines each. The language in the later sections is as watchful ("Looking") of the everyday and as defiantly juxtaposed as that in the first section. Here are opening lines to the first poem in "Dawn On."
Dawn on
As, iffy
Be so kind, looks on
The clear light     Friendlies
Embody the money, short for
Inscribe on to forever iris inside clasp
Suggestions unhinge putting something on if
Embody the body all on about
Suggestions unhinge iris inside clasp...
The longer pieces in "Dawn On" allow Greenwald to problematize a sweep of communally mediated ironies, such as "clear light     Friendlies," and pivotal thought experiments engaging repetitions in language and implosions in meaning as with the shifts in the verbs embody, unhinge. This first poem continues such repetitions, doing it blithely, "bubble," "happily," "light," "live," and this: "Love most about muse excuse / Come across, bait and switch ... Come across muse excuse..." These experiments are not over and may never get resolved, a State of The Worldless that Greenwald nevertheless kisses if not marries, since it's all of a projectile, a "fussball bubble / Nod happily feet many language." The invite is out there, according to Greenwald, "The clear light looks on..."

12/2/08


Angela Genusa, who blogs at Fiddling While Rome Burns, has a hardnosed response to my consuming wares of the APA (see the next post below). She writes —
Take into consideration that these statistics also include alcohol abuse. And that "psychiatric disorders" are now as commonly diagnosed as the common cold.

The APA is merely a PAC looking after of its own interests and those of its stockholders, namely Big Pharma.
Time for a two-way nomenklatura. First, I admit taking a drink now and then is sickness, so the shrinks have precision on their side. My catching a cold often is a part of it if not the whole problem. Booze, immodium, there's a song I never liked so I suspend its instrumentality. And it's hard not to trust a profession that's less self-interested than the humanists who invented Trojans and pharmaceuticals to put them on with, other than shrinks, that is. What most of us refuse to dance to is the (...cold sweat) fact that only by delving deeply into our populist cynicism will we redeem the bacchanalia of self-destruction. Deeply on the surface, that is.

The surge at home. Most poetry appears tame when you consider: Almost half of college-aged individuals had a psychiatric disorder in the past year. From Archives of General Psychiatry, Dec. 2008.

12/1/08




Vanessa Place
La Medusa
University of Alabama 2008

Antifreeze in the desert. Also in the dessert. Vanessa Place's La Medusa bubbles up from the most bugged bedroom imaginable, offering itself "sopped and blotted" to "no palms, though there's still Gypsys," to "no giddyup," to no "misappelled Felicia, clasping her troubled and ample bosom," to no fault in the least, hey "Puta" — this is a "change up" novel smacked with vipers, "motherfuckin Ice Man." How or why didn't we know LA language, our language, would shrink William Burroughs to one of those diamondback bargain seekers snaking around Best Buy, trampling security to save on a flat screen, angling and protesting mightily "to cheat the Fates" alongside "German oder Korean women whose accents were thick and odd as almond paste who tried to catch us shoplifting but never could." If you have designs on a big poetics narrative, now, you'll need outsized characters porting tv's like sacks of manure, packing a Tarot deck, full medical care, and holding their pets close like "almost-purple boas" that bring their own island memories for the drugged legend parts "well-gauzed in twilight and sea mist most of the time, which kept the Gorgons hidden from passersby 'til it was too late for them." A "constant feeding" of androgyny fortifies the muscular constrictors and their big sisters. Astonishing, a saxophone, ice cream, and sex-as-a-commodity figure prominently. When it comes down to cases, it's a simple story, "Prima was proud of her snakes..."